23. August 2020 · Comments Off on Thomas Kuhn · Categories: News · Tags:

On the other hand, we are ahead of a paradox? If the kuhniana theory is destined to the aging before the anomalies that will have to make to lapse the concept of auto-correctable science, this our proper analysis is contaminated with the fallibity, we make since it from Kuhn. More if we do not desire to construct a reflection not dismissable, however valid and perennial, to who to appeal? We come close ourselves, then, of Hegel philosopher, who emphasizes the dialtico process of autonegao and unfolding of the idea that thus is materialize of systematic form. Such approach philosophical is for to stand out that thesis that if digladia with antithesis, will remain in synthesis, as well as its proper opponent, nor that it is as model historical of past that guarantees one better understanding of the historical formation of the synthesis, that if it transforms into a new effective thesis, in turn also predestinold when dialtico devir. Then, the scientific contributions of Kuhn, as well as the paradigm the one that it also associates and our research, total is not excluded from the perenidade, since they can assist in the understanding of the History of science being useful to reconstruct the process of formation of the future paradigms that will construct its proper history, when they will be en vogue in the scientific field, also they passing assuming the characteristic of past historicidade. If you are not convinced, visit The Journal of Educational Research. References ABBAGNANO. Nicola.

Dictionary of Philosophy. 5.ed. So Paulo: Martins Sources, 2007. ALVES, Rubem. Philosophy of science: introduction to the game and its rules. 5.ed. So Paulo: Brasiliense, 1984. EPSTEIN, Isaac.

Thomas S. Kuhn: the understood cientificidade as the validity of a paradigm. In: OLIVA, Alberto Org.. Epistemologia: the cientificidade in question. Campinas: Papirus, 1990. KUHN, Thomas S. the structure of the scientific revolutions. 5.ed. Trad.: Beatriz Vianna; Nelson Boeira. So Paulo: Perspective, 2000. VIGAS, Janilson J. the Thomas Kuhn: the force of the paradigms in the traditions of scientific research. Echoes, So Lus, v.1, n.1, p.31-60, jan, /jun.2003. ______. Normal science in Kuhn: the scientific activity under the guardianship of a paradigm. Echoes, So Lus, v.2, n.1, p.25-44, jan. /jun.2004. REALE, Giovanni; ANTISERI, Dario. History of the Philosophy: of the Romantismo until our days. v.3 8.ed. So Paulo: Paulus, 2007.

Comments closed.